WebJul 3, 2024 · I used boost::interprocess to create a boost::multi_index data structure in shared memory. There are many client processes that will access this data structure. When accessing, I will lock the data structure. The problem I encountered is Once the client process is accessing the data structure and crashes without releasing the occupied lock, … WebBoost C++ Libraries...one of the most highly regarded and expertly designed C++ library projects in the world. — Herb Sutter and Andrei Alexandrescu, C++ Coding Standards
RT-mutex implementation design — The Linux Kernel …
WebAdded posix robust mutex implementation to allow subsequent mutex lock can grab the lock from previous dead owner. And it also fixed the issue #65. Hi Reviewers, We ran into some issues while we are using boost::interprocess::named_recursive_mutex with posix implementation when the previous owner of the mutex has been dead without releasing … WebThe mutex subsystem checks and enforces the following rules: Only one task can hold the mutex at a time. Only the owner can unlock the mutex. Multiple unlocks are not permitted. Recursive locking/unlocking is not permitted. A mutex must only be initialized via the API (see below). A task may not exit with a mutex held. fbi bank robbery statistics 2020
Changed the posix mutex implementation to be robust #66 - Github
WebI also did a benchmark on my PC. For 1 locking operation, the result is approximately: boost::mutex: 0.043 micro second, boost::recursive_mutex: 0.068 micro second. Re-entrant mutex is the default in Java and C#. Generally speaking, if a mutex is shared by many modules/classes, it’s recommended to use boost::recursive_mutex; while if it’s ... http://antonym.org/2012/02/threading-with-boost-part-iii-mutexes.html Webboost::mutex provides only the member functions lock() ... An exclusive lock is always the sole owner of a mutex. Another lock can only get control of the mutex after the … fbi bank robbery statistics 2019